The Plating Forum: Minimizing Signal Transmission Loss in High-Frequency Circuits


Reading time ( words)

Introduction
The amount of information transferred on wireless networks has increased dramatically with the growth of mobile phones, internet access, and handheld devices. The transmission of a high-speed RF signal is increasingly required in PCBs to handle massive data in electronic systems. The transmission speed of signals propagating inside the system has been increasing. RF signal loss, also known as insertion loss, becomes remarkable on a PCB in the higher GHz frequency ranges. Insertion loss is the loss of signal power resulting from the insertion of a device in a transmission line or optical fiber and is expressed in decibels (dB). Insertion loss could lead to rising edge degradation of signals or higher rate bit error and so on.

All PCB materials have both conduction and dielectric RF signal losses. The conduction losses are resistive and are caused by the conductive copper layer used in the board. The dielectric losses, on the other hand, are associated with the substrate (insulating material) used in a PCB. In this column, I will highlight resistive conduction losses by the copper layer used in the board.

The study of transmission loss involves plotting the electrical behavior (scattering matrix), measured in dB, of linear electrical networks when undergoing various steady-state stimuli by electrical signals versus increasing signal frequency (GHz). Transmission loss, also known as insertion loss, is the extra loss produced by the introduction of the device under test (DUT) between the two reference planes of the measurement. The extra loss may be due to intrinsic loss in the DUT and/ or mismatch. In case of extra loss, the insertion loss is defined to be positive. The negative of insertion loss expressed in dB is defined as insertion gain.

Skin Effect
Unlike DC or AC current that flows through the whole conductor trace, RF current does not penetrate deeply into electrical conductors but tends to flow along their surfaces; this is known as the skin effect. Signal loss in the conductive copper layer is directly related to the phenomenon of “skin effect.” Skin depth is the depth of the conductor the RF current uses. Basically, less of the conductor is used as the frequency increases Figure 1.

Two phenomena that have a direct impact on insertion loss due to the “skin effect” are the degree of copper roughness (Figure 1) and the nature of the surface finish used. Surface finishes that contain electroless nickel on the surface, like electroless nickel immersion gold (ENIG) and electroless nickel electroless palladium immersion gold (ENEPIG), show greater insertion loss due to the resistive properties of the electroless nickel as compared to copper. Newer finishes like electroless palladium immersion gold (EPIG) and immersion gold electroless palladium immersion gold (IGEPIG) are the preferred finishes for minimum insertion loss in high-frequency applications.

Copper Surface Roughness

Copper surface roughening is purposely done to enhance adhesion of the conductor to the dielectric in multilayer structures. Roughening is accomplished by chemical or mechanical means, creating anchoring sites for the resin. This has worked well for non-RF current applications, and it would also work well for RF signals propagating at lower frequencies. However, as the frequency increases closer to 10 GHz or above, the skin depth is reduced. When the skin depth is equal to or less than the copper surface roughness (Figure 1), then the roughness will result in increased resistivity of the trace and will impact the conductor loss and the phase angle response of the circuit.

milad_fig1_0620.jpg

As signal frequency increases, electrical signals increasingly run closer to the copper conductor surface. This leads to increased resistance and transmission loss.

Circuits using copper with a rougher surface will have more conductor loss than circuits using copper with a smoother surface. More specifically, the copper surface at the substrate-copper interface is the concern for surface roughness in relation to conductor loss. Recent developments in enhancing adhesion in multilayer boards go beyond the standard roughening created by black and brown oxide.

Today, most inner layers rely on chemical etching to micro-roughen the traces for maximum bonding. However, micro-roughening is not the answer to minimizing conductor signal loss. Chemical bonding is becoming the choice for adhesion for traces carrying high-frequency RF signals; it is also very effective on smooth copper surfaces.

One chemical bonding system offered today is a combination of immersion tin, followed by a treatment with a silane coupling agent. The treatment is usually carried out in horizontal conveyorized equipment and results in excellent adhesion between conductor and dielectric. According to one source [1], “Studies have shown that copper foil types of varying degrees of roughness have a direct effect upon the insertion loss of a stripline structure. New treatments targeted at conductor insertion loss and surface roughness minimization are being offered by chemical suppliers.”

Insertion Loss and Surface Finish
Handheld devices are a key driver for miniaturization by circuit designers. Fine lines and spaces are being normalized for many of these applications. In addition, the need for wire bonding focuses attention on nickel gold (ENIG) and nickel palladium gold (ENEPIG). These finishes are beginning to meet limitations when it comes to high (10 and 10+) GHz RF signal transmission. The electroless nickel layer is an integral part of the surface of the conductor. There is a transmission loss associated with the skin effect of the electroless nickel as compared to copper.

Newer surface finishes for high-frequency RF transmission are now available. These finishes eliminate or reduce the use of EN. The most common one today is electroless palladium immersion gold (EPIG). I covered EPIG in a previous column. Here, the focus is on insertion loss.

Figure 2 includes a plot of the scattering parameter (S-parameter) as the vertical axis versus the signal Frequency on the horizontal axis. With S-parameters, scattering refers to the way in which the traveling currents and voltages in a transmission line are affected when they meet a discontinuity caused by the insertion of a network into the transmission line. A baseline is first established, and a new plot is then measured with the introduction of the DUT. The difference is the transmission loss or insertion loss and is measured in dB.

milad_fig2_0620.jpg

Figure 2 compares the insertion loss of surface finishes with nickel (two variations of ENEPIG and one for ENIG), reduced nickel (thin nickel ENEPIG), and no nickel (EPIG and IGEPIG). Thin nickel ENEPIG has as little as 4.0 µins (0.1µm) of electroless nickel. IGEPIG is a variation of EPIG. EPIG uses an immersion palladium catalyst on the copper surface to initiate electroless palladium deposition; IGEPIG uses an immersion gold layer as the catalyst for the deposition of electroless palladium.

The different finishes were deposited on a single end 50Ω transmission trace (250 mm in length and 0.52 mm in width). Insertion loss measuring equipment was VNA 2VA67 (Rhode and Schwartz). As shown in the graph and summarized in the table (Figure 2), the insertion loss of low nickel and nickel-free gold surface finishes show a significant improvement in insertion loss value as compared to thick (120–240 µin or 3–6 µm) nickel gold finishes.

As the industry continues down the path of massive data transfer and miniaturization, the frequency of RF signal transmission will continue to increase. As 10 and greater GHz RF frequencies are designed into PCBs, special allowance must be made to minimize transmission loss due to copper roughness and type of surface finish used.

Reference
1. S. Hinaga, A. Rakov, M.Y. Koledintseva, & J.L. James, “Insertion Loss Reduction Through Non-Roughening Inner Layer Surface Treatments,” Proceedings of IPC APEX EXPO, March 2014.

George Milad is the national accounts manager for technology at Uyemura. To read past columns or contact Milad, click here.

This column originally appeared in the June 2020 issue of PCB007 Magazine.

Share

Print


Suggested Items

An Excerpt From the Book ‘Thermal Management: A Fabricator’s Perspective’

09/07/2020 | Anaya Vardya, American Standard Circuits
Thermal management in the printed circuit board (PCB) world is big business! A recent Markets and Markets report projects the thermal management market to reach $16 billion by the year 2024 with an average CAGR of 8% over that period. We have chosen to focus this book on providing designers a thermal management desk reference on the most current thermal management techniques and methods from a PCB fabrication perspective, including a case study on an extreme mixed-technology design that we recently produced. We hope you find value in our efforts.

Rethinking Interconnects With VeCS Technology

08/31/2020 | I-Connect007 Editorial Team
Nolan Johnson and Happy Holden chat with Joe Dickson of WUS about the work he’s done with VeCS, the continuing development of the technology, and the potential impact it can have on the manufacturing floor.

I-Connect007 Editor’s Choice: Five Must-Reads for the Week

08/21/2020 | Nolan Johnson, I-Connect007
This week, the top five is full of progress in technology and financial performance. It’s more evidence that the electronics industry, at its core, continues to thrive.



Copyright © 2020 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.