Controlling the ENIG Process for Optimum Efficiency and Performance


Reading time ( words)

Introduction

In last month’s Trouble in Your Tank, different levels of corrosion in the nickel deposit were presented. In addition, the suggestion was made that mid-phosphorous content EN process was more beneficial with respect to solderability, as opposed to a high phos content nickel deposit. Certainly, concerns with corrosion of the nickel (with lower phos) were allayed as long as the proper process controls were in place. Ideally, the ENIG process must provide the optimum in solder joint reliability while operating at the highest level of cost efficiency. All too often, process parameters that have the most influence on these critical attributes are poorly understood. An example of poor control is shown in Figure 1. The gold deposit has been removed in order to expose the electroless nickel surface.

It is very difficult to discern any anomalies in the nickel deposit without removing the gold. It is clear from the SEMs in Figure 1 that there is significant corrosion on the electroless nickel surface. Obviously, this is an unacceptable situation, and in order to prevent it one must work harder to optimize and control the electroless nickel-immersion gold process. Some of these factors will now be presented in detail.

Critical Electroless Nickel Features:

  1. Phosphorous content control in the electroless nickel deposit. Don’t underestimate this important parameter.
  2. Stabilizers in the EN solution influence phosphorous content in the deposit.
  3. Phos content has strong influence on solderability, immersion gold deposit thickness and potential for hyper-corrosion.

Let’s look at these points in a little more detail.

As I have written in this monthly column on many occasions, operating the chemical processes within the process window is the key to consistent and predictable performance. After all, your customers should expect no less from you. So with respect to #1 above, it is recommended that the EN process be able to maintain a reasonably tight window with respect to phos content through five metal (MTOs) turnovers in the nickel solution.

Read the full column here.


Editor's Note: This column originally appeared in the August 2014 issue of The PCB Magazine.

Share

Print


Suggested Items

Calumet Electronics and Averatek Team Up on A-SAP

12/02/2019 | Nolan Johnson, PCB007
Nolan Johnson talks with Brian Hess of Calumet Electronics and Mike Vinson of Averatek about the new, insertable additive processes that the companies are working on together to help factories running primarily subtractive processes to quickly convert to very high-density interconnect (HDI) features, including trace and space from 2.5-mil line and space to 1-mil line and space and below.

Future Trends in Flying Probe Testing

11/29/2019 | I-Connect007 Editorial Team
Peter Brandt, director of sales for Europe and Japan at atg, sits down with Pete Starkey and Barry Matties, gives his views on market requirements and testing technologies, and explains how flying probe testing is becoming the industry standard at all levels of production—and in many cases, the only practicable solution.

Solder Mask Tack Dry

11/08/2019 | Nikolaus Schubkegel
As a general rule, the tack-dry temperature should be as low as possible; in other words, it should only be as high as necessary. If the temperature is too low, the evaporation rate for the solvent will be to slow, and the solder mask will not dry in a reasonable amount of time. If the temperature is too high, however, the dry time certainly will be excellent, but it could create a solder mask lock-in with repercussions by the developing time.



Copyright © 2019 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.